19
Jun
Jun
Roger Federer v Rafael Nadal Wimbledon Final 2007 Highlights
Roger Federer secures his fifth Wimbledon title by beating Rafael Nadal in an exciting five set thriller
Highlights of the mens Wimbledon final 2007
ENJOY!!!
13 Responses to “Roger Federer v Rafael Nadal Wimbledon Final 2007 Highlights”
Leave a Reply
N ALSO
ur jus a hater man u nadal haters cant take it dah he is da real deal improved day by day on grass as every1 sayin nadal will win wimbledon b4 federer win french open nadal is wicked on all surfacesss federer hasnt took nadal 2 a 5set match in french open in 3 occasions nadal took federer 2 5setter IN WIMBLEDON on his 2nd attempt! n was unluky 2 take him 2 5setter in 2006
and The Strenght too
Federer has the Amazing tennis, and Nadal hase The Mentaly Force and the speed. Both are Amazing Players
excuse me, I meant “the #1 playing the #4.”
This was to theflylives1
Ever since I played tennis the #1 seed ALWAYS played the #4 seed in tournaments, not the #3.
I think the #1 seed deserves to have a lighter draw than the #2.
I TOTALLY AGREE.
i hope they put djoko in fed draw since its unfair for him and rafa to knock each other before the finals in every slam.
wow watching this in high quality is kick ass!
This discussion is stupid, cuz you and I dont know the future, you dont know if Nadal will fall for injuries and I dont know if Roger wont win nothing more. Djokovic is a great player too, but Nadal had won to Djokovic 8 times, 3 on clay 2 on grass, 2 on hard and 1 on carpet. Djokovic 3 on hard. If Nadal wants to be one of the greatest obviously needs to improve his game on hard, and I think so cuz this year he arrived to semifinals at Australian Open.
Federer wins his first title in Hamburgo 2002 with 21 years, and his first slam in Wimbledon with 22 years. After all he starts his explosion like a great player. Nadal wins his first title in Sopot 2004 with 17 years, and he wins his first slam with 18 years, the French. When he was just a kid, Nadal with 22 starts to improve his game in all surfaces, he had won Queens on grass, Masters series Indian Wells,Madrid or Montreal on hard(miami final this year)..this is the “claycourter”
Roger made his debut in Atp in 1998, Nadal in 2003. So Federer had played 5 years more than Nadal. And Nadal had won already, 6 grand slams finals and had won 11 masters series, the same as Sampras, only 3 less than Fed, and 6 less than Agassi. you seriously think that this guy wont win more titles than those guys??
I see Federer fans are too blind, ok, the future will shut your mouth. Nadal:
-Holds longest all-courts winning streak.81.
-Only man to have won French Open on clay and Queens on grass in a week(this they slowed too, right??
-Tied with Borg with 4 French Opens in a row.
-Undeafeated at French Open 28-0
-Tied with Sampras in Masters Series(11)
-Only man in circuit with Roger to have won titles in all surfaces, clay, carpet,hard and grass.
And all this still beginning his career.