19
Jun
Jun
Roger Federer v Rafael Nadal Wimbledon Final 2007 Highlights
Roger Federer secures his fifth Wimbledon title by beating Rafael Nadal in an exciting five set thriller
Highlights of the mens Wimbledon final 2007
ENJOY!!!
13 Responses to “Roger Federer v Rafael Nadal Wimbledon Final 2007 Highlights”
Leave a Reply
im english but i always back nadal. i hope he wins this year he deserves it
Pd: Sorry, but I dont speak English, I try to write the best as I can…
YOure only be patient, Iam sure that if nadal plays 9 times on grass against Roger, for sure wins more than 1 match. Roger had won 1/9 matchs on clay against Rafa, a Rafa who was just a child.
Whe, Nadal has never beaten Federer on grass, but Federer has beaten Nadal on clay.
In fact, Federer has a 5-2 record against Nadal on non-clay surfaces.
Roger Federer is the winner for sixth time .
Glad wimbledon has begun! no grand slam compares to it!! the best there is cant wait !!! id like to see a new winner this year though!! (in mens)
Your bored theory comes again, Federer with 22 years, didnt play finals on australian open or UsOpen. Nadal is improving, maybe he never will arrive to Federer titles on hard court, but we will see.
Federer isnt the second best claycourter in the last years, I remember when the same Filippo Volandri defeate him, players like Ferrer, Coria, Almagro, Ferrero, etc are better than Roger on clay. Nadal had played two finals on grass last 2 years, and he won players like Baghdatis, Berdich,Murray,Youzhny, Roddick or Djokovic on grass. Those guys on clay fall in the first rounds, but in this “slow” grass, comes to the final rounds…your theory is just stupid.
Nadal has never made the finals of either the Australian or US Open. He is not the all-surface, all-court player Roger Federer is.
theflylives: Shut up if you always say stupid things, the officials from Queens, Slow the grass down too?? Your problem you cant accept Nadal is a superplayer even on grass, If Federer dont exist, he had won Wimbledon already, the same thing for Roger at French Open against Nadal. Roddick plays the semifinal at FrenchOpen on slow clay??No. But he plays semifinals at Queens??Yes, so Queens or Wimbledon are still so fast.
I knw tht…my comment is for those who think luck is wht wins matches…and i seriously feel tht the courts should not have been slowered down.
dream on stupid, fed will leave the sport long before nadal and djoko
Sorry, “dude,” but Djokovic played Federer in Monte Carlo on clay just a few weeks ago, and got TROUNCED.
Djokovic is not now, nor will ever be, the tennis player that Roger Federer is.